HOME ABOUT US DONATE ASK THE RABBI CONTACT US
Chabad Jewish of Randolph NJ, Judaism and Torah for Hebrew School and Preschool


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
52 Comments Posted


Torn Between Torah and Science



Question:

I am deeply perturbed by the conflicts between Jewish beliefs and science. My heart and at times my mind, too, lead me to Torah, but at other times, my minimal understanding of science causes me to wonder about it all.

Answer:

You speak of a conflict between science and faith and how this rips you apart in two directions at once. Let me provide a simple way to make this much easier for you:

The conflict really has nothing to do with science, nor with faith. The conflict has to do with purpose.

The standard materialist, empiricist, reductionist view that many scientists take has nothing to do with purpose. The trinity of this faith is Chance, Necessity and the Human Mind. From these supreme deities arise the demigods of Matter and Energy.

I call it a faith because not only has science itself never provided a logical basis for belief in this pantheon, but has demonstrated many times over the absurdity of it all. As the esteemed British theoretician of science, Alfred North Whitehead wrote in the 1920s:

"The state of modern thought is that every single item in this general doctrine is denied, but that the general conclusions from the doctrine as a whole are retained. The result is a complete muddle in the scientific thought, in philosophic cosmology and in epistemology. But any doctrine which does not implicitly presuppose this point of view is assailed as unintelligible."

I'll detail it out a little:

1. Prove to me that everything in the universe must make sense to the human mind? On the one hand, the scientist tells us that our mind evolved through the challenges of survival. On the other hand, he claims that this jelly-like grey-matter device that so evolved is capable of explain the basic truths and origins of all things. Could anything be more absurd?

2. Explain to me what is chance and what is necessity? The cosmologist chooses at whim which elements of existence are so because they must be so and which originated at the outset of the universe.

3. Explain why we cling to this anachronistic notion of energy and matter in the mechanistic, Cartesian sense after a century of scientific probing and discovery has demonstrated again and again how inadequate these notions are in explaining the phenomenon of the quantum world.

So science is also a religion of faith. But it is faith without purpose. It is faith that we are simply artifacts of a cold, indifferent universe. Nothing has meaning, other than being material to write yet another doctoral thesis.

The ancient faith of the Jew, on the other hand, is a belief that life itself is nothing but meaning. Reality is personal. The focus of life is my decisions, what I choose to do with life. Those decisions and their consequences are more real than any star or subatomic particle, any fact in Wikipedia or news on your TV screen. Whereas to the contemporary scientist, life is a phenomenon, to the traditional Jew, life is real.

As I promised, I've tried to simplify the matter by deconstructing the common terms in which we generally couch this conflict.

I hope this helps--mainly because I don't see why any of this conflict should get in the way of you adopting the entire beauty of Shabbat and bringing our rich heritage into your life with a complete heart.


Share thisPost a CommentPrintSend this page to a friendSubscribe
52 Comments Posted

By Tzvi Freeman   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author

Rabbi Tzvi Freeman heads Chabad.org's Ask The Rabbi team, and is a senior member of the Chabad.org editorial team. He is the author of a number of highly original renditions of Kabbalah and Chassidic teaching, including the universally acclaimed "Bringing Heaven Down to Earth." To order Tzvi's books click here.


The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by our content partner, Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

52 Comments Posted  |  Post A Comment
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: July 15, 2008
For Josef
Concerning the Bible Codes, this is by far an accepted study for orthodox Jews. The Rebbe, in fact, dismissed it offhand.

Concerning Biblical Studies, there is no "unanimous view"--that is total nonsense. A strong, intelligent voice on the side of tradition can be found in the ground-breaking work of Provan, Long & Longtemp in "A Biblical History of Israel" (2003). There are many others.

Concerning the "analysis of text"--I am very familiar with such analysis in contemporary literature and I find the analysis of these critics--who truly believe they are "scientists"--bordering on the follies of graphology and psychoanalysis. I am not alone. Take a look for yourself--but with as critical an eye as you use when reading the material on our site. You'll see that all their analysis is nothing but projections of preconceived opinions--not much different than seeing canals on Mars.
Posted By Tzvi Freeman (author)

Posted: July 15, 2008
Rabbi, my basic point was that you present an idealized view of the process involved in the creation of and modifications to the Jewish religion.

My opinion is that the path to the present was difficult and substantially different than your description of events.

The Bible (or Torah) Codes is a recent example of an appealing idea to Orthodox Jews, which gains some measure of acceptance, and is in fact not deep, profound, or containing any wisdom.

My earlier labelling the codes silly was not exact on my part, there are a few academics who defend the concept., Hashem knows why.

This site inspired me to look into Biblical Studies a little. The unanimous view in this field, is that the Torah was written after the Judges period. This is based not so much on "science" as on analysis of the texts.

Looked at from this perspective one gets a sharply different picture, hence my remarks on backwards prophecy.
Posted By Josef I Friedman, Hillsborough, NJ
via myjewishcenter.org

Posted: July 14, 2008
Re: Thank you responding....(Josef)
Not following. A little more explicit?
Posted By Tzvi Freeman (author)



Post a Comment
Subject:
Comment:
  1000 Characters Remaining
Name*:
Email*:
City:   State/Country:
* indicates a required field
 


Ethics & Religion
Isn't it More Important to Feed the Hungry?
Can a Person be 'Good' without being Spiritual?
Is Religion a Crutch?
Who Needs Religion, if It's the Cause of So Much Violence?
Does Religion Cause War?
Torn Between Torah and Science
Is There a Cure for Jealousy?
There’s so much hypocrisy!
Is Guilt Good?
How Do You Fight Evil?
How Does G-d Decide What's Right and What's Wrong?
Where Do Ethics Come From?
Who Wants a Religion of No's?
The Glory of Doing Nothing
How Does 'Forgiveness' Work?
Showing 1 to 15 of 32

Related
  More articles on
Logic (6 articles)
Torah & Science (43 articles)

Chabad of Randolph 48 West Hanover Ave Randolph, NJ 07869 973-895-3070

Powered by Chabad.org © 2001-2009 Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. All rights reserved.
In everlasting memory of Rabbi Yosef Y. Kazen, pioneer of Torah, Judaism and Jewish information on the web